<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Commentary Archives - Law Offices of Popper &amp; Yatvin</title>
	<atom:link href="https://popperyatvin.com/blog/tag/commentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://popperyatvin.com/blog/tag/commentary/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 20:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">226311403</site>	<item>
		<title>Brown v. Board of Education at 65</title>
		<link>https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/05/brown-v-board-of-education-at-65/</link>
					<comments>https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/05/brown-v-board-of-education-at-65/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan L. Yatvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2019 18:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popperyatvin.com/blog/?p=1020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>65 years ago the Supreme Court of the United States issued the decision in Brown v. Board of Education, a historic decision on desegregation in public education, outlawing so-called separate but equal discrimination in public education.   One might think that the issue was well-settled, but Brown is once again in the news. As a Washington Post op-ed noted yesterday: &#8220;More than two dozen of President ... <a title="Brown v. Board of Education at 65" class="read-more" href="https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/05/brown-v-board-of-education-at-65/" aria-label="More on Brown v. Board of Education at 65">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/05/brown-v-board-of-education-at-65/">Brown v. Board of Education at 65</a> appeared first on <a href="https://popperyatvin.com">Law Offices of Popper &amp; Yatvin</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>65 years ago the Supreme Court of the United States issued the decision in <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, a <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/case.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">historic decision</a> on desegregation in public education, outlawing so-called separate but equal discrimination in public education.  </p>



<p>One might think that the issue was well-settled, but <em>Brown</em> is once again in the news. As a <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/05/17/many-trump-judicial-nominees-wont-affirm-brown-v-board-ruling-that-concerns-some-legal-experts/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Washington Post op-ed</a> noted yesterday: &#8220;More than two dozen of President Trump’s judicial nominees have declined to answer whether <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> was properly decided.&#8221;</p>



<p>On the 50th anniversary of the <em>Brown</em> decision, I wrote an essay for Philadelphia&#8217;s newspaper serving the legal community, <em>The Legal Intelligencer</em>.  On the occasion of the 65th anniversary, I am republishing that essay.((  At the time of her death in March 2018, I also <a href="https://popperyatvin.com/2018/03/27/linda-brown/">wrote of Linda Brown</a>, whose father joined the eponymous law suit on her behalf. ))</p>


<p><br /><span id="more-1124"></span></p>
<div id="\&quot;e2\&quot;">May 17, 2004</div>
<div id="\&quot;e3\&quot;">
<p><span class="\&quot;text\&quot;"><b>Facts to Know, Tell On Landmark Case</b></span></p>
<p><i>By <a href="https://popperyatvin.com/alan-l-yatvin/">Alan L. Yatvin</a><br />Special to the Legal Intelligencer</i></p>
<p>The popular media are replete with articles, editorials and TV specials marking the  50th anniversary of <i>Brown v. Board of  Education</i> and the end of the &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; doctrine that served to foster racial segregation in public education. However, I wanted to offer my colleagues a lawyer\&#8217;s take on the people and events surrounding that watershed decision. Hence, to commemorate the occasion, here are some facts you may not have known about <i>Brown</i>:</p>
<p>✦ <i>Brown</i> was the culmination of a long line of cases brought to challenge racial segregation in public education, dating to an 1849 case brought in Boston. In Kansas, alone, 11 such cases were brought between 1881 and 1949.</p>
<p>✦ <i>Brown</i> was the product of a campaign conceived by NAACP counsel <a href="https://www.naacp.org/oldest-and-boldest/naacp-history-charles-hamilton-houston/" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">Charles Hamilton Houston</a> and advocated by his protege and successor <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1993/01/25/us/thurgood-marshall-civil-rights-hero-dies-at-84.html" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">Thurgood Marshall</a> and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/13/us/jack-greenberg-dead.html" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">Jack Greenberg</a>, both of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. In 1948, the NAACP board of directors formally adopted Marshall&#8217;s plan by deciding to concentrate its efforts on an all-out attack on segregation in education. During the next three years, the NAACP commenced or joined the five cases that were ultimately consolidated under <i>Brown</i>.</p>
<p>✦ At oral argument in <i>Brown</i>, John W. Davis, co-counsel for the South Carolina appellees, quoted W.E.B. DuBois in support of the argument that it was more harmful to black children to thrust them into an integrated environment where white children, teachers and parents despised, resented, mocked, neglected, bulled and literally rendered life a living hell.&#8221;</p>
<p>✦ DuBois, a Harvard graduate, who famously wrote, &#8220;I was in Harvard but not of it,&#8221; was one of the founding members of the NAACP in 1909. He was the passionate editor-in-chief of the NAACP&#8217;s magazine, <i>Crisis</i>.</p>
<p>✦ Oliver Brown, the name plaintiff in <i>Brown</i>, was one of nearly 200 plaintiffs from four states and the District of Columbia, challenging &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; educational systems. The only case in which relief was granted the plaintiffs was <a href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11204748335824988118&amp;hl=en&amp;as_sdt=6&amp;as_vis=1&amp;oi=scholarr" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener"><i>Belton v. Gebhart</i></a>, in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The young chancellor who ordered integration of the Delaware schools was Collins Seitz Sr., who went on to become a judge of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.</p>
<p>✦ <i>Brown</i> was first argued in December 1952. In June 1953, the U.S. Supreme Court ordered reargument to be held in October at the start of the new term. Just before reargument, Chief Justice Fred Vinson died unexpectedly. Vinson was believed to have supported continuation of segregation under the &#8220;separate but equal&#8221;  standard. Remarking on Vinson&#8217;s passing, Associate Justice Felix Frankfurter is reported to have quipped, &#8220;It&#8217;s the first indication I&#8217;ve had that there is a God.&#8221;</p>
<p>✦ President Eisenhower nominated Earl Warren to replace Vinson on Sept. 30. The court rescheduled argument for December. Warren, who was confirmed as chief justice by the Senate in March 1954, delivered the unanimous opinion of the court on May 17. Even though his Justice Department argued in support of desegregation in <i>Brown</i>, Eisenhower disliked <i>Brown</i> and failed to publicly endorse the decision. He felt it was a mistake to start with schools, rather than public accommodations.</p>
<p>✦ The original 1952 argument in the consolidated <i>Brown</i> cases commenced at 1:30 p. m. on Tuesday, Dec. 9, recessed overnight, and continued shortly after noon the following day. Marshall ended his rebuttal argument by stating: &#8220;But the rights of the minorities &#8230; have been protected by our Constitution, and the ultimate authority for determining that is this court. I think that is the real difference. As to whether or not I, as an individual, am being deprived of my right is not legislative, but judicial.&#8221;</p>
<p>✦ The Supreme Court severed <i>Bolling v. Sharpe</i>, the District of Columbia case, from the <i>Brown</i> cases, because the 14th Amendment was not applicable to the District of Columbia. On the same day the Supreme Court declared in <i>Brown</i> that &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, it handed down a <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/497/case.html" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">decision in <i>Bolling</i></a>, ruling that racial segregation in the District of Columbia public schools violated the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.</p>
<p>✦ Sociological evidence was presented in the lower courts to demonstrate that &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; had a devastating effect on African-American children. This evidence included research by Dr. Kenneth Clark, who showed black dolls and white dolls to African-American children and asked them to chose the good dolls. They chose the white dolls. Robert L. Carter, a U.S. Senior District Court Judge, who argued the <i>Brown</i> case with Marshall, was the principal advocate of including this sociological evidence. Eastern District of Pennsylvania Senior Judge <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/13/us/louis-pollak-judge-and-civil-rights-advocate-dies-at-89.html" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">Louis H. Pollak</a>, who was part of the <i>Brown</i> team, argued against the inclusion of the sociological evidence, asserting that it was unnecessary.</p>
<p>✦ The Supreme Court cited the Clark research in support of its decision in <i>Brown</i>. In January of this year, Pollak, sitting with Carter on a forum at Howard University Law School, told Carter, &#8220;You were right and I was wrong.&#8221;</p>
<p>✦ Pollak was on all the <i>Brown</i> briefs, along with Philadelphian William T. Coleman Jr., Oliver Hill and Carter, Constance Baker Motley and Jack B. Weinstein, author of the definitive treatise on the Federal Rules of Evidence.</p>
<p>✦ On May 31, 1955, the Supreme Court handed down <i>Brown II</i>, which ordered desegregation with &#8220;all deliberate speed.&#8221; The court&#8217;s use of the term &#8220;all deliberate speed&#8221; is regarded as a catalyst for the student protests that launched the civil rights movement, because many Southern states took advantage of the vagueness of the order to thwart integration. Prince Edward County in Virginia, a defendant in one of the consolidated <i>Brown</i> cases, chose to close its public schools for five years rather than honor the <i>Brown II</i> order.</p>
<p>✦ One of the signatories to <i>Brown II</i> was Justice John Marshall Harlan II, who was nominated to the court in the year between <i>Brown I</i> and <i>Brown II</i>, upon the sudden death of Justice Robert Jackson. Harlan, who became known as the &#8220;Great Dissenter&#8221; of the Warren Court, was the grandson of Justice John Marshall Harlan. The first Justice Harlan, a Kentuckian and former slave owner, was named for John Marshall, the first chief justice of the Supreme Court. When he joined the Supreme Court in 1877, Harlan was the only law school graduate among the nine sitting justices. He was also the lone dissenter in the 1896 decision in <a href="https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/163/537/case.html" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener"><i>Plessy v. Ferguson</i></a>. It was in <i>Plessy</i> that the Supreme Court established the &#8220;separate but equal&#8221; doctrine that became the constitutional basis for segregation.</p>
<p>✦ Harlan&#8217;s <i>Plessy</i> dissent argued that forced segregation stamped blacks with a badge of inferiority. This same line of argument became a decisive factor in Brown, where the Supreme Court expressly overruled <i>Plessy</i>. In his <i>Plessy</i> dissent, Harlan coined the phrase &#8220;Our Constitution is colorblind.&#8221; Southern District of New York Senior Judge Constance Baker Motley, an attorney with the NAACP legal team during <i>Brown</i> and the first African-American woman appointed to the federal bench, recalls that during the <em>Brown</em> fight, Thurgood Marshall picked himself up in low moments by reading aloud from Harlan&#8217;s <i>Plessy</i> dissent.</p>
<p>✦ In 1979, three young African-American attorneys in Topeka, Kan., petitioned the district court to reopen Brown to determine whether the school board had eliminated all vestiges of discrimination. That case, known as <i>Brown III</i>, resulted in the Topeka Public Schools building three magnet schools. [<a href="http://www.cjonline.com/news/20180326/linda-brown-center-of-brown-v-board-case-dies-at-75" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">Linda Brown joined that suit as a plaintiff.</a>]</p>
<p>✦ On Tuesday, May 11, 2004, one week before the 50th anniversary of the decision in <i>Brown v. Board of Education</i>, a state district court judge sitting in Topeka issued an order essentially closing the Kansas Public Schools for the coming school year, due to the failure of the Legislature to provide sufficient funds to ensure constitutionally adequate education to poor, disabled and minority children in Kansas. <i>Brown v. Board of Education</i> was one of the authorities cited by the court.</p>
<p>✦✦✦✦</p>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/05/brown-v-board-of-education-at-65/">Brown v. Board of Education at 65</a> appeared first on <a href="https://popperyatvin.com">Law Offices of Popper &amp; Yatvin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/05/brown-v-board-of-education-at-65/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1124</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 22, 1973, at about 10 AM</title>
		<link>https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/01/january-22-1973/</link>
					<comments>https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/01/january-22-1973/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan L. Yatvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2019 15:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Yatvin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popperyatvin.com/blog/?p=1002</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Memory is strange.  My son, Dan, has a savant-like ability to precisely place and describe even the most mundane events, going back to nursery school.  My recall of even important moments is foggier.  Unlike most people born before 1960, I do not remember where I was when I learned that John F. Kennedy had been ... <a title="January 22, 1973, at about 10 AM" class="read-more" href="https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/01/january-22-1973/" aria-label="More on January 22, 1973, at about 10 AM">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/01/january-22-1973/">January 22, 1973, at about 10 AM</a> appeared first on <a href="https://popperyatvin.com">Law Offices of Popper &amp; Yatvin</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Memory is strange.  My son, Dan, has a savant-like ability to precisely place and describe even the most mundane events, going back to nursery school.  My recall of even important moments is foggier.  Unlike most people born before 1960, I do not remember where I was when I learned that John F. Kennedy had been shot.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">However, one very distinct memory I have from my youth is where I was on January 22, 1973, at about 10 AM.<span id="more-1123"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I was on a senior trip to Washington, DC, with 10 other members of my high school political science class (several of whom I remembered clearly and a few I didn’t recall being there until I looked at the newspaper photo accompanying a story on our trip).  I remember the chaperones: Greg Dean, our poli sci teacher, who was a nice guy, and guidance counselor, Dave Olson, who I will always remember as the adviser who tried to discourage me from applying to college, instead suggesting I consider vocational school.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The main event around which our trip was planned was Richard Nixon’s second inauguration.  In a story about our trip, the <em>Wisconsin State Journal</em> quoted me as saying of the inauguration: “The ceremony was very impressive, even if it was for Nixon.”  <a href="//obits.oregonlive.com/obituaries/oregon/obituary.aspx?n=milton-b-yatvin&amp;pid=190998569\&quot;" target="\&quot;_blank\&quot;" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">My father</a>, who passed away last month at 88, told me that he took a lot of crap for that line, although I could tell from his crinkled eyes and poorly stifled smile that he was not the least bit displeased.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft" src="https://www.horseandman.com/wp-content/uploads/Caisson-photo2.jpg" />Two days after the inauguration, Lyndon Johnson died.  We were still in Washington for the funeral procession.  My most distinct memory is of <a href="//www.nytimes.com/1976/02/07/archives/black-jackfamous-as-riderless-horse-at-funerals-dies.html\&quot;" target="\&quot;_blank\&quot;" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">Black Jack</a>, the riderless horse with the reversed boots in the stirrups.  On January 23rd we were in the House of Representatives when Nixon announced that the Vietnam peace agreement had been reached in Paris.  That same day we met the Apollo 17 astronauts who were also visiting Congress.  It was a busy week.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On Monday, January 22, 1973, we visited the Supreme Court of the United States.  Little did I realize, in the moment, that I was present for what would become one of the best known and most controversial events in modern American jurisprudence.   Justice Harry Blackmun announced the decision of the Court.  I understood the decision was important, even though it only got 43 seconds on the evening news.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In 1973 I had no plans to be a lawyer.  My dreams of being a marine biologist had been dashed by my complete befuddlement in chemistry class (ironically, my son, Jeremy, has a doctorate in chemistry).  I was into wheel pottery, but I knew potter was not going to be my profession.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It was not until several years after that visit to the Court that I actually read the decision from that day.  I’d finally decided I wanted to be a lawyer, and <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/03/nyregion/murray-edelman-81-professor-and-pioneer-in-political-science.html" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">Professor Murray Edelman</a> assigned it in my college constitutional law class.  I read it again in law school when <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1998/05/25/nyregion/telford-taylor-who-prosecuted-nazis-at-nuremberg-war-crimes-trials-is-dead-at-90.html" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener">Professor Telford Taylor</a> assigned it to my constitutional law class. (I wonder what Taylor, the former Nuremberg war crimes prosecutor, would think of my doing defense work at the successor war crimes tribunals in The Hague and Cambodia.)</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Over the years I have watched courts and legislators chip away at that seminal 1973 decision.  Nominees to the Supreme Court have been asked about it in detail.  Recent appointments to the Supreme Court have placed the vitality of the decision in ever great doubt.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I haven’t been back into the Supreme Court (except in writing) since that day.  But this Tuesday, as on every anniversary since 1973, I will remember that I was in the Supreme Court of the United States when Justice Blackmun announced the 7-2 decision that would change the lives of so many, ignite 4 ½ decades (so far) of political battles and further fuel ever renewing efforts to interfere with the private decisions of American women.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On January 22, 1973, at about 10 AM, 17 year-old me listened in a hushed Supreme Court as the decision was announced in <a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1971/70-18" target="_blank" rel="\&quot;noopener\&quot; noopener"><em>Roe v. Wade</em></a>.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/01/january-22-1973/">January 22, 1973, at about 10 AM</a> appeared first on <a href="https://popperyatvin.com">Law Offices of Popper &amp; Yatvin</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://popperyatvin.com/blog/2019/01/january-22-1973/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1123</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
