Gideon v. Wainwright

Gideon v. Wainwright: Facts to Know and Tell

By Alan L. Yatvin

In Philadelphia and across the country, lawyers, the judiciary and politicians are examining the quality and adequacy of funding for legal representation of indigent criminal defendants.  The case that confirmed the broad right to such representation was Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).  This month we commemorate the 50th Anniversary of the decision.  Here are some facts you may not have known about Gideon:

♦ The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to … have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.”

♦ The right to assistance of counsel was part of James Madison’s original proposed Bill of Rights presented in a speech to Congress on June 8, 1789.

♦ Alexander Hamilton, argued against having a Bill of Rights in Federalist No. 84, because, in part, of his concern that the failure to mention other rights would imply they were not protected.  This concern led to the inclusion of the Ninth Amendment: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

♦ It was not until 1938 that the Supreme Court confirmed that the Sixth Amendement right to counsel in all federal prosecutions included providing counsel to defendants who could not afford to hire an attorney.  The opinion was written by Associate Justice Hugo Black.  Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S. 458 (1938).

♦ In Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932), the Supreme Court ruled that 14th Amendment due process included a meaningful right to counsel in capital cases.

Powell was the famous case of the Scottsboro Boys, nine black men who were charged with raping two white women on freight train traveling through Alabama.  Eight of the nine were sentenced to death following one day trials of three defendants each.  The defendants actually had lawyers appointed at trial, but not during the six days between arraignment and trial. The Supreme Court held that due process required timely appointment of counsel for capital defendants who could not afford to retain counsel.

♦ In Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 (1942) the Supreme Court declined to extend Powell and declared that the right to appointed counsel did not generally extend to non-capital cases, unless trial without a lawyer, after “appraisal of the totality of the facts in a given case [demonstrates] denial of fundamental fairness, shocking to the universal sense of justice…” Later cases held that such denial required a showing of “special circumstances” like illiteracy, ignorance, youth, mental illness, complexity of charges or misconduct of the prosecutor.  Justice Hugo Black dissented in Betts.

♦ In 1961 Clarence Earl Gideon was a fifty-one year-old white man, charged with burglary of a bar in Panama City, Florida.  He was a four time convicted felon who had been in and out of jail much of his life.

♦ When his case was called to trial on August 4, 1961, Gideon informed the judge that he was not ready for trial because he did not have a lawyer.  When pressed to explain, he said he could not afford a lawyer and asked the judge to appoint a lawyer, incorrectly stating that “the United States Supreme Court said I am entitled to be represented by counsel.”  The judge informed him there was no such right and the case proceed to trial.

♦ As the Supreme Court later explained: “Put to trial before a jury, Gideon conducted his defense about as well as could be expected from a layman. He made an opening statement to the jury, cross-examined the State’s witnesses, presented witnesses in his own defense, declined to testify himself, and made a short argument ‘emphasizing his innocence to the charge contained in the Information filed in this case.’ The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and petitioner was sentenced to serve five years in the state prison.” 372 U.S. at 337.

♦ Gideon appealed to the Florida Supreme Court, which denied him relief without opinion.

♦ On January 8, 1962, the Clerk of the United States Supreme Court received Gideon’s five page, handwritten in pencil petition for a writ of certiorari asserting a denial of due process in the refusal of the Florida judge to provide him an attorney.  Gideon asserted no “special circumstances”.  Gideon’s petition was one of nine such in forma pauperis petitions received by the Court that day.

♦ The State of Florida filed no response to the petition during the routine 30 day hold period.  However, when the petition was then sent to the chambers of Chief Justice Earl Warren, he directed the Clerk to write the Florida attorney general requesting a response.

♦ Florida responded that the case was controlled by Betts, and that Gideon had alleged no special circumstances.  Gideon responded: “it makes no difference how old I am or what color I am or what church I belong to if any.  The question is I did not get a fair trial.  The question is very simple.  I requested to the court to appoint me [an] attorney and the court refused …”

♦ On June 4, 1962, the Supreme Court granted Gideon’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari on the question of: “Should this Court’s holding in Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455, be reconsidered?”

♦ The Court appointed Washington power lawyer and experienced Supreme Court litigator, Abe Fortas.

♦ The Florida attorney general wrote the attorney generals of the other 49 states, seeking friend of the court (amicus) briefs in support of Florida’s position that the right to counsel presented by Gideon was an issue of states’ rights, and that Betts should not be overturned.

♦ Several attorneys general responded that they were considering filing an amicus brief.  The attorney general of Minnesota, however, responded: “Since I firmly believe that any person charged with a felony should be accorded the right to be represented by counsel regardless of his financial condition, I would welcome the courts’ imposition of a requirement of appointment of counsel in all state felony prosecutions.”  That man was future senator and vice-president, Walter F. Mondale.

♦ Mondale’s correspondence with the Florida attorney general was the impetus for an amicus brief supporting Gideon drafted by several Harvard Law School professors, which was ultimately signed by twenty-three states.  Only two states, Alabama and North Carolina, ended up signing an amicus brief supporting Florida.  That brief, drafted by the Alabama attorney general, stated the view that an indigent defendant without counsel “stands a better chance of obtaining from a jury either an outright acquittal or less severe punishment than one represented by an attorney… [and only a  few lawyers would be] equal matches for career prosecutors.”

♦ The ACLU filed an amicus brief which included a survey of state court decisions under the Betts “special circumstances” test.  Of one-hundred such appellate decisions, only eleven found special circumstances.  Only one Pennsylvania case, out of forty-four, was found to present special circumstances, with three having been remanded for a hearing.

♦ After the grant of certiorari but before argument, Justice Felix Frankfurter, a strong supporter of states rights and Betts, retired from the Court.  President Kennedy appointed Secretary of Labor Arthur J. Goldberg as his replacement to the so-called “Jewish seat”, previously held by Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo.

♦ In 1965 liberal lion, Harvard economist and advisor to presidents, John Kenneth Galbraith, recommended Justice Goldberg to President Johnson to fill an opening as Ambassador to the United Nations.  Goldberg was replaced on the Supreme Court by Gideon lawyer Abe Fortas.  Fortas was later forced to resign from the Court due to an ethics scandal.  Galbraith came to regret his role in Goldberg leaving the Court, later writing: “I did little for liberalism that morning.”

♦ The Supreme Court heard oral argument in Gideon on Tuesday, January 15, 1963.

♦ The case was filed as Gideon v. Cochran, but was changed after oral argument when Louie L. Wainwright was named the new Director of the Florida Division of Corrections.

♦ On Monday, March 18, 1963, Justice Hugo Black, the author of an impassioned dissent in Betts twenty-one years earlier, announced the decision of the Court overruling Betts.  There were concurring opinions by Justices William O. Douglas, Tom C. Clark and John Marshall Harlan.  There were no dissenters.

♦ In the wake of Gideon, the battle then shifted to funding for counsel for the indigent.  On May 22, 1963, Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy testified about appointed counsel in the federal system:  “Federal courts today continue to delegate the defense of the underprivileged to assigned counsel who are not paid for their services.  They are not reimbursed for their out-of-pocket costs.  They do not receive a shred of investigative or expert help.  They are not appointed until long after arrest, when witnesses have disappeared and leads grown stale.  They often lack the trial experience essential for a competent defense.”

♦ Two months after Gideon, Florida passed a statute creating a public defender in each of the state’s sixteen judicial circuits.

♦ When the case was called for trial on remand before the original trial judge, Gideon refused to be represented by two ACLU lawyers, including one involved in the Supreme Court amicus brief, and instead asked for appointment of local lawyer W. Fred Turner.

♦ Turner investigated the case, hitting the streets himself, and even picking pears with the key prosecution witness’ mother in her backyard to gather information.

State v. Gideon was retried on August 5, 1963.  Turner, who declined to make an opening, cross-examined the prosecution witnesses, presented a surprise defense witness to impeach the State eye-witness, called Gideon and made closing argument.  After deliberating for 65 minutes, the jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty.  Gideon was freed after nearly two years in the state penitentiary.

♦ Nine years later, in another Florida case, the Supreme Court held that defendants may not be imprisoned if they did not have counsel, thus extending Gideon to misdemeanors and many so-called petty offenses where defendants face incarceration.  Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 US 25 (1972).  Gideon had died five months earlier.

♦ “If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence Earl Gideon had not sat down in prison with a pencil and paper to write a letter to the Supreme Court; and if the Supreme Court had not taken the trouble to look at the merits in that one crude petition among all the bundles of mail it must receive every day, the vast machinery of American law would have gone on functioning undisturbed. But Gideon did write that letter; the court did look into his case; he was re-tried with the help of competent defense counsel; found not guilty and released from prison after two years of punishment for a crime he did not commit. And the whole course of legal history has been changed.”  Robert F. Kennedy, November 1, 1963.

♦ New York Times Supreme Court Reporter Anthony Lewis wrote a book on the case called Gideon’s Trumpet.  The book has been continuously in print since it was first published in 1964.  It was made into a 1980 TV movie starring Academy Award winners Henry Fonda as Gideon, José Ferrar as Abe Fortas and John Houseman as the Chief Justice.  Lewis died in March 2013, shortly after the 50th Anniversary of the decision in Gideon.

 

*Gideon’s Trumpet was a source material for some of the information in this article.

Share

2 thoughts on “Gideon v. Wainwright”

  1. Thorough and interesting review of the case and those involved at every level. It made me proud of some people I had previously admired and scornful of those who refused to consider poverty a special circumstance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *